Smarter Signage Strategies for Higher Ed –
Join the Session!By Tim Vaughan
— July 31st, 2025
There’s no single answer, of course, but if there were one, it would be: dial down the information deluge and create better, more relevant content. Messages that are clear, relevant, human, and respectful of employees’ time and attention. That “human” bit is already critical but in the age of AI, the need for authenticity becomes even more crucial. Organizations must take care to ensure that AI tools support, rather than dilute, the humanity of internal communications. (And, yes, full disclosure, AI has been enlisted to support the creation of this blog)
To meet the challenges outlined below, organizations must fundamentally rethink their approach to communication, prioritizing quality over quantity, empathy over noise, and purposeful storytelling over scattershot updates. In the sections that follow, we delve into today’s most pressing internal communication hurdles and share how they can be overcome through smarter strategies, a people-first mindset, and the right tools.
Internal communication has entered a new era, one defined by hybrid work, digital transformation, and a fundamental shift in how attention is earned. As Andrew Hubbard, Poppulo’s Director of Communication, puts it, internal communicators are no longer just competing with busy workdays. They’re up against Instagram Reels, TikToks, YouTube Shorts, and a dopamine-fueled scroll engineered to entertain, distract, and captivate.
And the data confirms it:
It matters because when employees are drowning in noise but starved of clarity, trust and business performance inevitably decline.
The consequences are real, as the statistics above highlight: employees missing information despite being overwhelmed with communication; workplace messaging that’s not relevant to recipients; poor communication resulting in lost productivity. And more.
Information silos form when departments or teams operate in isolation, hoarding knowledge, duplicating work, and failing to share insights across the organization. While silos may arise from rapid growth, geographic dispersion, or legacy systems, their impact is cultural as much as operational.
Silos slow down workflows and fracture the employee experience. When teams lack visibility into each other’s work, they miss opportunities for collaboration, innovation, and alignment. Employees begin to identify more with their department than with the organization, leading to tribalism, resistance to change, and a lack of shared purpose.
According to McKinsey, siloed organizations are slower to respond to change and less likely to innovate. Gallup’s State of the Global Workplace shows that disengaged employees—often a byproduct of siloed communication—are 18% less productive and 43% more likely to leave.
In global organizations, communication must transcend borders, both linguistically and culturally. A message that resonates in New York might fall flat in New Delhi. Tone, hierarchy, humor, and even color symbolism vary widely across cultures, and failing to account for these differences can lead to confusion or offense.
Cultural misalignment undermines trust and clarity. It can also alienate employees, particularly those from underrepresented or marginalized groups.
A report from The Economist Intelligence Unit found that 42% of workplace miscommunication stems from differing communication styles.
In many organizations, communication still flows in one direction: top-down from leadership to employees. But in a world of rapid change and rising employee expectations, this model is no longer sustainable.
Feedback is a mechanism for improvement, but more importantly it’s a signal of respect. When employees feel their voices matter, they’re more engaged, more innovative, and more loyal.
According to Gallup, highly engaged teams show 21% greater profitability, and 17% higher productivity compared to disengaged teams.
Even the most well-crafted message will fail if it’s delivered on the wrong channel. When critical updates are buried in inboxes or lost in chat threads, employees miss out.
Channel misalignment leads to confusion, duplication, and disengagement. It also wastes time—both for communicators and employees.
Only 32% of employees say the information they receive helps them do their job better (Microsoft Work Trend Index, 2023).
In many organizations, communication is reactive rather than intentional. Messages are sent when something goes wrong, when leadership needs to push a change, or when HR needs to tick a compliance box. But without a structured approach to dialogue, communication becomes fragmented, inconsistent, and often one-sided.
Structured dialogue is the foundation of a healthy communication culture. It ensures that employees not only receive information but also have opportunities to respond, reflect, and contribute. This two-way flow builds trust, strengthens alignment, and fosters a sense of ownership.
According to a Harvard Business Review study, unstructured communication, especially in meetings, leads to wasted time, unclear decisions, and employee frustration. Moreover, when employees don’t know when or how they’ll be heard, they disengage.
The modern workplace is saturated with tools—email, Slack, Teams, Zoom, intranets, mobile apps, and more. While each tool serves a purpose, the lack of integration and strategy often leads to confusion, duplication, and missed messages.
The right tools, used the right way, can dramatically improve communication efficiency and effectiveness. But when tools are misaligned with message type or audience, they become part of the problem.
According to Microsoft’s Work Trend Index, employees spend an average of 57% of their time communicating—yet only 32% say the information they receive helps them do their job better.
That’s a massive productivity gap.
Inconsistent messaging is one of the fastest ways to erode trust. When employees hear different things from different leaders, or receive conflicting updates across channels, they begin to question the credibility of the message and the competence of the organization.
Clarity and consistency are the bedrock of effective communication. They reduce confusion, accelerate decision-making, and build confidence—especially during times of change.
A Holmes Report study found that poor communication costs large companies an average of $62.4 million per year in lost productivity. Much of this stems from misalignment, rework, and delays caused by unclear or conflicting messages.
Many organizations still rely on outdated feedback mechanisms: annual surveys, static suggestion boxes, or top-down reviews. These approaches are too slow, too narrow, and too disconnected from the day-to-day realities of employees.
Regular feedback is essential for agility, innovation, and morale. It helps leaders identify emerging issues, spot opportunities, and build a culture of continuous improvement. More importantly, it signals to employees that their voices matter.
It’s generally accepted that employees who receive regular feedback are more likely to be engaged at work but several studies highlight how infrequently employees receive feedback.
Even well-intentioned communication can excluded people. Whether through language, imagery, tone, or timing, messages that don’t reflect the diversity of the workforce can alienate employees and undermine trust.
Inclusion is about voice as much as it is about representation. When employees feel seen, heard, and respected, they’re more likely to contribute, collaborate, and stay.
According to Deloitte, inclusive companies are 2x more likely to meet or exceed financial targets, and 6x more likely to be innovative. Yet many organizations still struggle to embed inclusion into their communication practices.
Without clear protocols, communication becomes chaotic. Messages are duplicated, missed, or misaligned. Employees don’t know what to expect or where to look.
Protocols create clarity. They help employees understand who communicates what, when, and how. This reduces confusion, builds confidence, and ensures consistency.
A lack of communication governance leads to inefficiencies, rework, and disengagement.
Organizations with clear communication structures are more likely to outperform their peers.
Trust is fragile. It’s built slowly through consistent, honest communication, and lost quickly through mixed messages or broken promises.
Employees watch what leaders do as much as they listen to what they say. Perhaps more so.
When communication is consistent with action, trust grows. When it’s not, skepticism sets in.
According to Edelman’s Trust Barometer, 1 in 3 employees don’t trust their employer to do what’s right. This lack of trust leads to lower engagement, higher turnover, and reputational risk.
Many organizations talk about collaboration but that’s as far as it goes. Teams remain siloed, and cross-functional work is the exception, not the norm.
Collaboration drives innovation, accelerates problem-solving, and improves the employee experience. It also helps organizations respond more effectively to change.
Harvard Business Review emphasizes that cross-silo collaboration is essential for revenue growth and customer satisfaction, especially in complex, fast-moving industries.
Disconnected tools and workflows make collaboration harder than it needs to be. Employees waste time switching between platforms, duplicating work, or searching for information.
The right platforms make collaboration seamless. They reduce friction, increase transparency, and help teams move faster together.
According to Asana’s Anatomy of Work Index, employees spend 60% of their time on “work about work”—like searching for information or managing tools.
Too many communication strategies are set once and forgotten. But employee needs, business priorities, and workplace norms are constantly evolving.
What worked last year—or even last quarter—may not work today. Regular assessments ensure that communication remains relevant, effective, and aligned with organizational goals.
According to Gallagher, 60% of organizations lack a long-term internal communication strategy.
This leads to reactive messaging, missed opportunities, and inconsistent employee experiences.
The workplace is changing—fast. From AI and automation to hybrid work and generational shifts, employee expectations are evolving in real time.
A static communication strategy is a vulnerable one. To stay relevant, internal comms must be agile, data-driven, and employee-centric. The
Organizations that fail to adapt risk losing top talent, falling behind competitors, and missing opportunities for innovation.
Trust and authenticity must be the bedrock of internal communication in the age of AI. Employees will quickly disengage if messages feel machine-generated or lack the warmth and credibility of a real human voice. To truly connect, organizations must deliver communications that are not only human but also highly relevant, targeted, and personalized— so employees receive the information they need to excel in their roles without being distracted or frustrated by irrelevant noise.
Achieving this requires communication technology that can navigate the complexity of reaching and understanding a diverse workforce—technology like Poppulo, which has long been a leader in employee communications and is now redefining the field with agentic AI that empowers organizations to connect with their people in smarter, more meaningful ways.