First in our industry to be responsible AI certified
Learn more →
Struggling with the communication gap? Or just curious about ways to reach frontline employees? A new study presents a data-driven view of frontline communications and the solutions that help companies turn strategy into action.
It's a fact: frontline employees represent nearly 80% of the global workforce. They are at the very heart of daily operations, customer satisfaction, and business continuity. But despite all this, most remain distant from corporate communication strategies, held back by limited access to digital tools, and a heavy reliance on managers to relay information.
The result? This disconnect leads to operational inefficiency, weakened engagement, and inconsistent message delivery. And that directly impacts business performance.
To better understand how organizations truly communicate with their frontline teams, and to better explain the persistence of this communication gap, Ennova and Esade recently conducted a mixed-method international study:
The study was revelatory in that it uncovered some striking patterns in how current internal comms practices consistently come up short for frontline workers. Problems that the study identified include:
HQs prioritize email, intranet, and apps, but most frontline employees cannot access them. Managers still rely on briefings and informal conversations.
They act as the primary communication relay but lack time, tools, and structured processes.
31% of content is purely operational, with very little recognition, vision, or values—reducing connection and engagement.
85% of employees depend on manager meetings to share concerns, which are slow, hierarchical, and often unreliable.
Many organizations lack a clear roadmap, and 45% have no plan to improve field communication.
With these challenges in mind, the study also proposes a larger overview, concrete solutions, and real world examples to illustrate the issue, including:
Ready to reach a fuller understanding of the challenges facing frontline communications in today's digital, AI-driven world? Interested in solutions that can bring stronger connection with your own frontlines? Get the full study and learn how organizations can better connect, engage, and support their frontline employees.

Internal communicators measure plenty. Open rates, click-throughs, attendance, views, and reach—most IC teams have dashboards full of the stuff. What they struggle with is proving that any of it made a difference to the business. And business impact is the only measurement their leaders genuinely care about. It's a gap most IC practitioners feel acutely. Gallagher's 2026 Employee Communications Report found that seven in 10 internal communicators still measure only basic activity metrics, and fewer than one in eight measure business impact. Measurement is the weakest capability in their global readiness model, and teams relying only on activity data are the ones struggling most to demonstrate their value. This is a two-part guide built to close that gap. Part One is the Masterclass. It sets out why outcome measurement matters, the frameworks that make it manageable, and the principles separating measurement that proves impact from measurement that just fills a dashboard. Part Two is the Playbook. It's the templates, the worked example, and the sample dashboard—the practical tools you'll need for a successful comms campaign. Read the Masterclass for the thinking. The Playbook is where you'll find the tools to put it into practice. We hope you find them useful. Tim Vaughan Editorial Director, Poppulo

Many IC teams measure and report on what's easy to count: email open rates, video views, all-hands attendances. Outputs that leadership don’t much care about. They want to know whether communications actually changed anything—whether people understood something important and whether behavior looked different afterward. Leaders want proof of impact, they want to see results. Outputs don't give them that. Outcomes do. Part One of this paper, the Measurement Masterclass, clearly showed why. Here, Part Two gives you the tools to measure outcomes: four templates you can fill in for your own campaigns, plus a full worked example showing all four completed together, so you can see how they fit before you use them yourself. What’s inside: The Know/Feel/Do Framework. Defines what a specific audience needs to know, feel, and do as a result of your communication—specific enough to measure. One template per audience segment. The Outcome/Output/Measurement Plan. For each outcome, sets out the communication tactic you'll use and how you'll measure whether it worked. This is the template you'll use most. The SMART Objectives Worksheet. A short exercise for turning a vague goal into a specific, measurable one, with a number and a deadline attached. The Power/Influence Grid. Maps your audience by power and attitude—champions, supporters, blockers, detractors—so you know where to put your effort. A worked example. All four templates completed end-to-end for a company-wide AI policy rollout, so you can see the whole process applied to one campaign from start to finish. A sample measurement dashboard. A one-page example of how to present outcome data to leadership. Written by Andrew Hubbard, Senior Director of Communications at Poppulo, and Joanna Hall of Afire Consulting.

Lost in the AI Lingo? Here’s your cheat sheet to bots, buzzwords & brainy tech, made simple for internal comms pros.